I've added some new Chinese and English vocabulary pages that are available from my Lingopath site. You can go to the pages directly using the links below, or from the Lingopath home page, click on the Chinese Language and Culture link in the middle column and scroll down to the Chinese & English Vocabulary Heading, where you will also find a number of other vocabulary links. The new Chinese Vocabulary pages are:
Literature
Computers
Topics, Opinions & Situations
Some World Leaders (already a little out of date in the 3 weeks since I put it up)
Some People in the China Connection (includes hanzi and pinyin for some modern Chinese leaders).
A lot of people studying a language are also interested in or at least exposed during their study to literature. The Literature Chinese vocabulary page that I just posted addresses vocabulary for literature in general. I am working on a separate page for Chinese Literature, that I am not ready to post yet. I have also been thinking of adding some well known names from Western Literature, perhaps as a separate page, because the first one about literature is already reasonably long.
The Computer vocabulary page is a start to a page, that I would definitely like to add more to.
I thought that having some World leaders' names in hanzi and pinyin might help us if we attempt to read international news in Chinese. A number of modern Chinese political leaders' names are in included in hanzi and pinyin on the Some People in the China Connection page, though there are a number of names there of Non-Chinese that are not shown in any real or attempted Chinese form. I do intend at some point to address the issue of characters that are most commonly used to transcribe or gloss non=Chinese names. I have included a lot of Wikipedia links on the World Leader and the China Connection pages. I would like to add a lot of names on the scholarly side to the China Connection page..
Monday, June 14, 2010
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
Some Tools and Tricks to help you learn to Read and Write Hanzi
Rev 3/8/10 -- One of the most frustrating things about learning Chinese (or Japanese, or traditionally written Korean, for that matter) is not only the mind-boggling number of characters (or variants, see previous post on dealing with both simplified and traditional characters), but the time and energy consuming difficulty of trying to look up something when you don't know the pronunciation. It gets worse if you find you have difficulty identifying which of the components of a character is the classificatory radical, ones principal traditional recourse for a non-phonetic look up! Maybe the character was in the section for that radical, but you missed it amidst the forest of other small printed characters, or perhaps you were looking in the wrong subsection, because you miscounted the remaining number of strokes to complete the character after the radical. Aargh!! What can you do?
You have a lot more courses of action if the material you are trying to read is online or already on your computer in some form. You can just copy and paste the expression into an online dictionary or annotator, among other choices. But more on this in a moment.
Before returning to online and other computer or electronic dictionary tools, let me just say that recently I have been trying to read some pages from a novel translated into Chinese. I have been trying to do this intensively (that means looking up almost every word of which I am not 100% sure of the meaning or pronunciation, including tone!--and to keep a computer vocabulary log too), rather than extensively (that means reading to cover much more ground, getting the general gist, but definitely not every word or pronunciation).
It has been a challenging and exhausting trip, but most helpful, not only for learning vocabulary and grammar in context, but also for discovering and rediscovering how to manage. It brought back memories of similar efforts and frustrations while trying to expand my knowledge of written Japanese over a number of year (but not recently) and briefly of traditionally written Korean while in graduate school. The experience reminded me of the value of having a number of strategies ready, depending on what tools you have available, but also so you have something else to try, if the first methods you use do not bring you success.
WHAT DID I DO FOR PRINT MATERIALS:
Can you make a guess at the pronunciation?
I found I could often guess one or two likely pronunciations because classifier/"phonetic" (phono-semantic compound characters, 形声字 xing2 sheng1 zi4) are by far the most common type of Chinese character. (See Wikipedia Chinese Character Classification.) Unfortuanately, there are several pitfalls in this method. Even originally, the so-called phonetic components of such compounds were often only suggestive of a similarity in sound, called a "rime" (or rhyme). Over the many centuries from then to modern Mandarin there have been major phonetic (and phonemic) changes. Some of the newly substituted phonetic components of some simplified characters may be a somewhat less risky basis for a guess at general pronunciation, although none of these helps you with tone.
What if you know or can guess the meaning, even if you don't know the pronunciation?
Sometimes you can find the word with its pronunciation by looking up what you think the meaning is in English.
Is the word is a compound beginning with a character you know?
If so, you can look in a character-based dictionary for compounds beginning with that character. A traditional character dictionary would show the next character based on the number of strokes, which would probably be a bit easier than one in which placement is determined by the character by character pronunciation. The latter would still be manageable in most cases, but you might have to scan a larger number of candidates, increasing the risk of overlooking the correct one. A letter by letter pinyin phonetic based dictionary, such as the Pocket Langenscheidt, that I prefer for fast lookup for words I hear, would not be a good choice here, because it does not lump words beginning with the same character together.
What if the word is or starts with a character you don't know?
I already mentioned the traditional classificatory radical plus remaining stroke count method. Even most phonetically based dictionaries have a radical index, followed by and index of characters beginning with each radical. Many simply give a page or character reference number for the main entry, but I generally prefer an index that gives the pronunciation of the character right there. A further cautionary note, the radical lists found in traditional character dictionaries and simplified character dictionaries differ somewhat, so you have to be careful. Also, several radicals have a full stroked version and a somewhat abbreviated version (with fewer strokes and altered appearance). On some radical lists, you may have to look in the section for the full number of strokes to find the abbreviated version also.
Two other alternatives for when you don't know the first character can be tried using the print version of the dictionary Chinese Characters: A Genealogy and Dictionary 中文字谱. This dictionary groups characters' main entries not by the traditional classifactory radical, but by some other component of the character, if there is one. Given the prominence of phono-semantic characters, this would principally be the so-called phonetic component. So if you know another character that shares that (traditional) component (because this dictionary is traditional character based), you should be able to find the unknown character near the main entry of the known one, and near its place on the "genealogical" tree located near the entries. This dictionary is obviously a tremendous tool for students who can benefit from seeing characters grouped together that have annoyingly similar appearances and perhaps pronunciations, but differing meanings and usages.
This same dictionary has one other outstanding feature, that few others do. Though character based dictionaries put words together that begin with the same character, almost none give more than perhaps an example or two of words in which the character is NOT the first character. This dictionary (and one excellent one I had for Japanese [to be listed] ) list a number of words in which the character is not first, along with a reference number (or furigana phonetics for the Japanese dictionary) to help you find the main entries for those words.
What if you already know Japanese or Korean and can read the Chinese characters used in each, called kanji and hanja (=hanzi), respectively?
The Sino-Japanese (on-yomi) or Sino-Korean pronunciation of Chinese characters (as opposed to the native Japanese [kun-yomi] or native Korean readings) can also provide a rather rough basis for a guess at pronunciation and/or a relatively decent basis for a guess at meaning. Some other tools may available. I don't really have a good Japanese-Chinese dictionary, though that might be helpful. However, I do have an old version of the Modern Chinese-Japanese Dictionary 現代中日辞典 （増訂版） put out by Kooseikan 光生館 that has an appendix that allows me to look up Chinese pronunciations of a number of characters from the Sino-Japanese pronunciation and from some native Japanese pronunciations. Also the same Japanese Kanji (character) dictionary that allows me to find compounds that start with another character, also lists a Chinese pronunciation for each character contained (other than ones unique to Japan), shows historic kana (which are indicative of past phonetic changes), and also indicates which of a couple of historic periods the Sino-Japanese reading belong to. There may be similar resources available to those with a knowledge of traditional written Korean.
WHAT IF YOU HAVE ACCESS TO ONLINE DICTIONARIES, ANNOTATORS, OR ELECTRONIC DICTIONARIES?
Online dictionaries such as MDBG or Yellow Bridge, some electronic dictionaries, and computer Chinese input methods IME's allow some additional alternative strategies.
MDBG or Yellow Bridge, Mandarin Tools downloadable Dim Sum Chinese Tools, and some PDA electronic dictionaries, such as that of PLECO allow you to draw the character in a grid with you mouse or a stylus. Software recognition of what you write is not bad but not perfect.
In these same sources, you can also try to do a search for compounds that contain (or begin or end with) a particular character or sound you know.
Another method is that if you have a Chinese input method set up on your computer, you can try to enter a pronunciation guess, particularly in combination with another character you know (which should greatly limit the possibilities), and see if the character comes up. Although you may still want to copy it into an online dictionary for meaning and tone information, it may still be faster than a more open search or manually looking in a print dictionary.
As additional practice along the same lines, I have even tried to retype several pages in verbatim, from something I was reading in a print version. This has the additional benefit of allowing me to do some things I could with text online or in a computer file. For example, I could paste some of the content into an annotator (see the section on Annotators in my previous posting on Dealing with both Simplified & Traditional Characters), or I could try pasting it into a translator (though I have words of caution to give about that, that will come in another entry.)
To summarize, I recommend having a number of tricks or strategies at the ready, depending partly on which tools you have at hand, which ones you are the best or fastest at using, and whether some methods have failed you, and so you still need something else!
You have a lot more courses of action if the material you are trying to read is online or already on your computer in some form. You can just copy and paste the expression into an online dictionary or annotator, among other choices. But more on this in a moment.
Before returning to online and other computer or electronic dictionary tools, let me just say that recently I have been trying to read some pages from a novel translated into Chinese. I have been trying to do this intensively (that means looking up almost every word of which I am not 100% sure of the meaning or pronunciation, including tone!--and to keep a computer vocabulary log too), rather than extensively (that means reading to cover much more ground, getting the general gist, but definitely not every word or pronunciation).
It has been a challenging and exhausting trip, but most helpful, not only for learning vocabulary and grammar in context, but also for discovering and rediscovering how to manage. It brought back memories of similar efforts and frustrations while trying to expand my knowledge of written Japanese over a number of year (but not recently) and briefly of traditionally written Korean while in graduate school. The experience reminded me of the value of having a number of strategies ready, depending on what tools you have available, but also so you have something else to try, if the first methods you use do not bring you success.
WHAT DID I DO FOR PRINT MATERIALS:
Can you make a guess at the pronunciation?
I found I could often guess one or two likely pronunciations because classifier/"phonetic" (phono-semantic compound characters, 形声字 xing2 sheng1 zi4) are by far the most common type of Chinese character. (See Wikipedia Chinese Character Classification.) Unfortuanately, there are several pitfalls in this method. Even originally, the so-called phonetic components of such compounds were often only suggestive of a similarity in sound, called a "rime" (or rhyme). Over the many centuries from then to modern Mandarin there have been major phonetic (and phonemic) changes. Some of the newly substituted phonetic components of some simplified characters may be a somewhat less risky basis for a guess at general pronunciation, although none of these helps you with tone.
What if you know or can guess the meaning, even if you don't know the pronunciation?
Sometimes you can find the word with its pronunciation by looking up what you think the meaning is in English.
Is the word is a compound beginning with a character you know?
If so, you can look in a character-based dictionary for compounds beginning with that character. A traditional character dictionary would show the next character based on the number of strokes, which would probably be a bit easier than one in which placement is determined by the character by character pronunciation. The latter would still be manageable in most cases, but you might have to scan a larger number of candidates, increasing the risk of overlooking the correct one. A letter by letter pinyin phonetic based dictionary, such as the Pocket Langenscheidt, that I prefer for fast lookup for words I hear, would not be a good choice here, because it does not lump words beginning with the same character together.
What if the word is or starts with a character you don't know?
I already mentioned the traditional classificatory radical plus remaining stroke count method. Even most phonetically based dictionaries have a radical index, followed by and index of characters beginning with each radical. Many simply give a page or character reference number for the main entry, but I generally prefer an index that gives the pronunciation of the character right there. A further cautionary note, the radical lists found in traditional character dictionaries and simplified character dictionaries differ somewhat, so you have to be careful. Also, several radicals have a full stroked version and a somewhat abbreviated version (with fewer strokes and altered appearance). On some radical lists, you may have to look in the section for the full number of strokes to find the abbreviated version also.
Two other alternatives for when you don't know the first character can be tried using the print version of the dictionary Chinese Characters: A Genealogy and Dictionary 中文字谱. This dictionary groups characters' main entries not by the traditional classifactory radical, but by some other component of the character, if there is one. Given the prominence of phono-semantic characters, this would principally be the so-called phonetic component. So if you know another character that shares that (traditional) component (because this dictionary is traditional character based), you should be able to find the unknown character near the main entry of the known one, and near its place on the "genealogical" tree located near the entries. This dictionary is obviously a tremendous tool for students who can benefit from seeing characters grouped together that have annoyingly similar appearances and perhaps pronunciations, but differing meanings and usages.
This same dictionary has one other outstanding feature, that few others do. Though character based dictionaries put words together that begin with the same character, almost none give more than perhaps an example or two of words in which the character is NOT the first character. This dictionary (and one excellent one I had for Japanese [to be listed] ) list a number of words in which the character is not first, along with a reference number (or furigana phonetics for the Japanese dictionary) to help you find the main entries for those words.
What if you already know Japanese or Korean and can read the Chinese characters used in each, called kanji and hanja (=hanzi), respectively?
The Sino-Japanese (on-yomi) or Sino-Korean pronunciation of Chinese characters (as opposed to the native Japanese [kun-yomi] or native Korean readings) can also provide a rather rough basis for a guess at pronunciation and/or a relatively decent basis for a guess at meaning. Some other tools may available. I don't really have a good Japanese-Chinese dictionary, though that might be helpful. However, I do have an old version of the Modern Chinese-Japanese Dictionary 現代中日辞典 （増訂版） put out by Kooseikan 光生館 that has an appendix that allows me to look up Chinese pronunciations of a number of characters from the Sino-Japanese pronunciation and from some native Japanese pronunciations. Also the same Japanese Kanji (character) dictionary that allows me to find compounds that start with another character, also lists a Chinese pronunciation for each character contained (other than ones unique to Japan), shows historic kana (which are indicative of past phonetic changes), and also indicates which of a couple of historic periods the Sino-Japanese reading belong to. There may be similar resources available to those with a knowledge of traditional written Korean.
WHAT IF YOU HAVE ACCESS TO ONLINE DICTIONARIES, ANNOTATORS, OR ELECTRONIC DICTIONARIES?
Online dictionaries such as MDBG or Yellow Bridge, some electronic dictionaries, and computer Chinese input methods IME's allow some additional alternative strategies.
MDBG or Yellow Bridge, Mandarin Tools downloadable Dim Sum Chinese Tools, and some PDA electronic dictionaries, such as that of PLECO allow you to draw the character in a grid with you mouse or a stylus. Software recognition of what you write is not bad but not perfect.
In these same sources, you can also try to do a search for compounds that contain (or begin or end with) a particular character or sound you know.
Another method is that if you have a Chinese input method set up on your computer, you can try to enter a pronunciation guess, particularly in combination with another character you know (which should greatly limit the possibilities), and see if the character comes up. Although you may still want to copy it into an online dictionary for meaning and tone information, it may still be faster than a more open search or manually looking in a print dictionary.
As additional practice along the same lines, I have even tried to retype several pages in verbatim, from something I was reading in a print version. This has the additional benefit of allowing me to do some things I could with text online or in a computer file. For example, I could paste some of the content into an annotator (see the section on Annotators in my previous posting on Dealing with both Simplified & Traditional Characters), or I could try pasting it into a translator (though I have words of caution to give about that, that will come in another entry.)
To summarize, I recommend having a number of tricks or strategies at the ready, depending partly on which tools you have at hand, which ones you are the best or fastest at using, and whether some methods have failed you, and so you still need something else!
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
Some Help for Moving between Simplified & Traditional Characters
(in Progress) My purpose is to offer a few practical suggestions to those who must learn to deal with both simplified Chinese characters and traditional Chinese characters (as if having to learn one form weren't difficult enough). I am not going enter into the debate between proponents and opponents of such changes (see Wikipedia article on the debate for one view on some pros and cons; more Wikipedia references to other related areas below).
Background
Variant forms of characters have actually existed for nearly as long as the characters themselves, not only in calligraphic styles (also reflected in some modern fonts), but also among everyday users of the written Chinese language. I am concerned here with the simplified characters officially adopted in the PRC, Singapore, and Malaysia on the one hand and the forms of traditional characters used in Taiwan, Hong Kong, and by many overseas Chinese, on the other hand. Those who deal with materials from both communities, read older or historical materials, or even just read articles in Wikipedia (many are not in simplified characters) must find some ways to learn the different forms and make the connections between the two. By the way, those moving between the study of Chinese and Japanese face a similar problem, because although modern Japanese has also undergone some simplification on a smaller scale, the characters simplified were not all ones simplified in the PRC, nor were they all simplified in the same way.
According to the Wikipedia artilce on simplified characters, simplified characters as used in the PRC today follow a 1986 restatement with very minor changes of so-called first-round changes made in 1956 and 1964. Second-round changes promulgated during the Cultural Revolution were officially abandoned in the 1986 announcement. There are about 350 characters changed in ways with no implications for other characters and 132 characters and 14 simplified radicals (components of characters) with changes that can be generalized to even more than the 1750+ illustrative characters listed in the 1986 government announcement.
Nature of the Changes
A number of methods of simplification were used, including merger of some more complicated characters with simpler ones, substitution of a new phonetic component for the old, replacement of more complicated elements with simpler forms, elimination of whole components of more complex characters, replacement of some characters with characters newly created from existing or simplified components, and the systematic and consistent replacement of some commonly recurring components or radicals.
Some Examples of correspondence of Simplified and Traditional Characters
1. Examples of methods of simplification in English Wikipedia article on simplified characters.
2. Even more examples of methods of simplification in the (traditional character) Chinese Wikipedia article on simplified characters.
3. For a list of what characters were merged with what others see the Wikipedia article on Simplified characters associatied with more than one traditional character.
4. Some examples of simplified radicals (coming soon).
5. Examples of common characters having different forms (produced by interpolating Jun Da's simplified character frequency list with a downloaded CEDICT file) (coming soon).
Helpful Print Media & Reference Materials
Unfortunately, few Chinese-English printed reference materials show both forms of characters. Some dictionaries that do, only show both forms for the main entry of a character only, but not for character combinations or examples.
The Oxford Concise C-E/E-C Dictionary is a notable exception, showing the traditional form ( in brackets) for most simplified characters that do not just have a simplified radical or are not otherwise easily recognizable. The 3rd edition is issued jointly with the Commercial Press (商务印书馆). Commercial Press also puts out The Pocket English-Chinese (Pinyin) Dictionary, which, though I wish were a little bigger in scope, offers similar support.
Some textbooks appear in separate editions with simplified or traditional characters (just one or the other), but this just caters to two separate markets, not helping one to learn both. Others, such as The New Chinese Practial Reader Series list the main dialogs or readings (but not all exercises) in traditional characters in an appendix. This is a step in a helpful direction, but having the texts nearer each other could be more helpful to those trying to make a connection between the two.
fortunately. there are some other printed resources, such as Claudia Ross' Chinese Grammar: A Practical Guide, which is filled with examples in both forms right next to each other.
Online Resources offer more in the way of help.
Online dictionaries: MDBG (based on CEDICT) displays both traditional and simplified for both word and character lookups. In Yellow Bridge (at least in the free version) search results are displayed only in one or the other at your choice, although once you select a single word or character, you will see both forms for the main entry, but not, for example, in the list of words starting or ending with the same characters as the word or character selected.
Annotators: Yellow Bridge's annotator (explanation) which allows you see pop-up translations and pronunciation shows both versions of the expression highlighed, regardless of which form you start with. MDBG's annotator is now available directly from the word dictionary page by clicking on the Look up all Chinese Words in a Text option. Among the options available, pop-up does not display both forms, but both the word-by-word translation option and the vocabulary list option do display both, again regardless of which form you start with. There are also downloadable versions of MDBG's and Yellow Bridge's Readers (for cost).
Popup Chinese does annotations of some news articles and other things, and both forms show (either in the annotation itself or the other form if there is one shows in the annotation). Mandarin Tool's downloadable Dim Sum annotator (and dictionary) [look for the Chinese software section in the left panel), annotations can be done of either form, but the alternative form is not displayed. On the other hand, any text copied into Dim Sum can be converted from one form to the other (though such conversions for any automatic device are much more likely to be accurate going into simplified rather than the other way around due to a number of mergers of two or more traditional characters into one simplified character [see my examples list]). Chinese-Tools also has an annotator. Several other commercial Chinese annotators/word processors are also available (Clavis Sinica, NJ Star, Twinbridge, Wenlin) and some have been commonly used in connection with some college Chinese programs, though I have not used any of them. You can also Google a phrase such as Chinese annotation tool.
For Character and Vocabulary Practice in both forms
Yellow Bridge's Language Center gateway allows access to memory game and flashcard practice for vocabulary from a large number of texts as well as to HSK vocabulary and Chinese characters by frequency, in either (but not both simultaneously in the free version). Still, this is a fabulous resource for practice in both.
Background
Variant forms of characters have actually existed for nearly as long as the characters themselves, not only in calligraphic styles (also reflected in some modern fonts), but also among everyday users of the written Chinese language. I am concerned here with the simplified characters officially adopted in the PRC, Singapore, and Malaysia on the one hand and the forms of traditional characters used in Taiwan, Hong Kong, and by many overseas Chinese, on the other hand. Those who deal with materials from both communities, read older or historical materials, or even just read articles in Wikipedia (many are not in simplified characters) must find some ways to learn the different forms and make the connections between the two. By the way, those moving between the study of Chinese and Japanese face a similar problem, because although modern Japanese has also undergone some simplification on a smaller scale, the characters simplified were not all ones simplified in the PRC, nor were they all simplified in the same way.
According to the Wikipedia artilce on simplified characters, simplified characters as used in the PRC today follow a 1986 restatement with very minor changes of so-called first-round changes made in 1956 and 1964. Second-round changes promulgated during the Cultural Revolution were officially abandoned in the 1986 announcement. There are about 350 characters changed in ways with no implications for other characters and 132 characters and 14 simplified radicals (components of characters) with changes that can be generalized to even more than the 1750+ illustrative characters listed in the 1986 government announcement.
Nature of the Changes
A number of methods of simplification were used, including merger of some more complicated characters with simpler ones, substitution of a new phonetic component for the old, replacement of more complicated elements with simpler forms, elimination of whole components of more complex characters, replacement of some characters with characters newly created from existing or simplified components, and the systematic and consistent replacement of some commonly recurring components or radicals.
Some Examples of correspondence of Simplified and Traditional Characters
1. Examples of methods of simplification in English Wikipedia article on simplified characters.
2. Even more examples of methods of simplification in the (traditional character) Chinese Wikipedia article on simplified characters.
3. For a list of what characters were merged with what others see the Wikipedia article on Simplified characters associatied with more than one traditional character.
4. Some examples of simplified radicals (coming soon).
5. Examples of common characters having different forms (produced by interpolating Jun Da's simplified character frequency list with a downloaded CEDICT file) (coming soon).
Helpful Print Media & Reference Materials
Unfortunately, few Chinese-English printed reference materials show both forms of characters. Some dictionaries that do, only show both forms for the main entry of a character only, but not for character combinations or examples.
The Oxford Concise C-E/E-C Dictionary is a notable exception, showing the traditional form ( in brackets) for most simplified characters that do not just have a simplified radical or are not otherwise easily recognizable. The 3rd edition is issued jointly with the Commercial Press (商务印书馆). Commercial Press also puts out The Pocket English-Chinese (Pinyin) Dictionary, which, though I wish were a little bigger in scope, offers similar support.
Some textbooks appear in separate editions with simplified or traditional characters (just one or the other), but this just caters to two separate markets, not helping one to learn both. Others, such as The New Chinese Practial Reader Series list the main dialogs or readings (but not all exercises) in traditional characters in an appendix. This is a step in a helpful direction, but having the texts nearer each other could be more helpful to those trying to make a connection between the two.
fortunately. there are some other printed resources, such as Claudia Ross' Chinese Grammar: A Practical Guide, which is filled with examples in both forms right next to each other.
Online Resources offer more in the way of help.
Online dictionaries: MDBG (based on CEDICT) displays both traditional and simplified for both word and character lookups. In Yellow Bridge (at least in the free version) search results are displayed only in one or the other at your choice, although once you select a single word or character, you will see both forms for the main entry, but not, for example, in the list of words starting or ending with the same characters as the word or character selected.
Annotators: Yellow Bridge's annotator (explanation) which allows you see pop-up translations and pronunciation shows both versions of the expression highlighed, regardless of which form you start with. MDBG's annotator is now available directly from the word dictionary page by clicking on the Look up all Chinese Words in a Text option. Among the options available, pop-up does not display both forms, but both the word-by-word translation option and the vocabulary list option do display both, again regardless of which form you start with. There are also downloadable versions of MDBG's and Yellow Bridge's Readers (for cost).
Popup Chinese does annotations of some news articles and other things, and both forms show (either in the annotation itself or the other form if there is one shows in the annotation). Mandarin Tool's downloadable Dim Sum annotator (and dictionary) [look for the Chinese software section in the left panel), annotations can be done of either form, but the alternative form is not displayed. On the other hand, any text copied into Dim Sum can be converted from one form to the other (though such conversions for any automatic device are much more likely to be accurate going into simplified rather than the other way around due to a number of mergers of two or more traditional characters into one simplified character [see my examples list]). Chinese-Tools also has an annotator. Several other commercial Chinese annotators/word processors are also available (Clavis Sinica, NJ Star, Twinbridge, Wenlin) and some have been commonly used in connection with some college Chinese programs, though I have not used any of them. You can also Google a phrase such as Chinese annotation tool.
For Character and Vocabulary Practice in both forms
Yellow Bridge's Language Center gateway allows access to memory game and flashcard practice for vocabulary from a large number of texts as well as to HSK vocabulary and Chinese characters by frequency, in either (but not both simultaneously in the free version). Still, this is a fabulous resource for practice in both.
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
Some Political Concepts--政治的概念
Here is a link to a list of some vocabulary relating to Political Concepts that further expands the political vocabulary area I opened with my previous post around the time of the US presidential election. I anticipate adding more terminology in this area, particularly relating more specifically to China. I added a few more terms on 3/1/09.
Vocabulary about the Environment--环境
Here is a link to a recent vocabulary list I put together with a number of terms relating to the environment and environmental protection. As I mentioned in the previous post, I am starting to put some newer vocabulary lists for Chinese into spreadsheet format at my Lingopath website. The greater width makes it easier to include traditional characters in addition to simplified, and I can also line up data types in columns in a way that may make access to data easier for learners. My intention is to offer open access on a basis like that of CEDICT.
Like all heavily industrialized countries, China also has to find ways to deal effectively with increasing pollution (污染 wu1 ran3) and the related problem of global warming (全球变暖 quan2 qiu2 bian4 nuan3). A certain amount of media attention has been focused on China's reaching a rate of current air pollution that surpasses that of the US. While any and all such problems require the most serious efforts towards viable solutions on the part of all parties, there is also something rather disingenuous in finger pointing at China by people in the developed countries of the West, and particularly by people in the US.
The West and the US have been the world's largest polluters at least since the beginning of the industrial age, so our cumulative "contribution" (that sounds too positive, doesn't it) must be utterly monumental compared to the newcomers on the block. The economic resources and research capabilities of the West have also been huge by comparison. How come we're not further along in the process to finding solutions. We pat ourselves on the back for certain standards that were set only at a point when our standard of living was well above that of today's China and other developing nations. Nevertheless, since the population of China is several times that of the US, the per person contribution of the US to pollution and global warming must still be several times that of China. And this is despite the fact that we in the West have "exported" much of our pollution to developing nations by means of the global economy. We reap the benefits of the products produced elsewhere, but we get to blame them for producing the pollution related to those products, while not having to breathe it etc. ourselves (locally, at least).
A much, much larger share of our contribution to pollution in the West relates to individual consumption and standard of living, things that are even more difficult to control politically and otherwise than the industrial area. Are we capable of addressing these issues in a country where recent government officials were in denial about the reality of global warming and the causal role played by people and pollution? All the world hopes for a higher standard of living, but the small fraction of the world's population that have achieved higher standards of living have already been the major force in driving the world to the brink of ecodisaster. All of us in the world need to be working very hard together to help each other arrive at solutions to these problems without just pointing fingers, as if that absolves us of our own collective and individual responsibility.
Like all heavily industrialized countries, China also has to find ways to deal effectively with increasing pollution (污染 wu1 ran3) and the related problem of global warming (全球变暖 quan2 qiu2 bian4 nuan3). A certain amount of media attention has been focused on China's reaching a rate of current air pollution that surpasses that of the US. While any and all such problems require the most serious efforts towards viable solutions on the part of all parties, there is also something rather disingenuous in finger pointing at China by people in the developed countries of the West, and particularly by people in the US.
The West and the US have been the world's largest polluters at least since the beginning of the industrial age, so our cumulative "contribution" (that sounds too positive, doesn't it) must be utterly monumental compared to the newcomers on the block. The economic resources and research capabilities of the West have also been huge by comparison. How come we're not further along in the process to finding solutions. We pat ourselves on the back for certain standards that were set only at a point when our standard of living was well above that of today's China and other developing nations. Nevertheless, since the population of China is several times that of the US, the per person contribution of the US to pollution and global warming must still be several times that of China. And this is despite the fact that we in the West have "exported" much of our pollution to developing nations by means of the global economy. We reap the benefits of the products produced elsewhere, but we get to blame them for producing the pollution related to those products, while not having to breathe it etc. ourselves (locally, at least).
A much, much larger share of our contribution to pollution in the West relates to individual consumption and standard of living, things that are even more difficult to control politically and otherwise than the industrial area. Are we capable of addressing these issues in a country where recent government officials were in denial about the reality of global warming and the causal role played by people and pollution? All the world hopes for a higher standard of living, but the small fraction of the world's population that have achieved higher standards of living have already been the major force in driving the world to the brink of ecodisaster. All of us in the world need to be working very hard together to help each other arrive at solutions to these problems without just pointing fingers, as if that absolves us of our own collective and individual responsibility.
Lingopath site & Chinese Language & Culture Page
I have recently set up a Lingopath website which will feature a number of pages of content and links. There is a Chinese Language & Culture Page, that will contain links to my most recent Chinese Study Links page (now hosted at the site), an index of my Chinese blog topics, and various other things. I am experimenting with posting new vocabulary lists for Chinese there in spreadsheet column format, with links and commentary here, for example.
Although I am particularly interested in producing new pages for Chinese at whatever pace I can manage, the site also has or will have various other Language & Culture Link pages, multilingual/international news and information links, and some additional types of content.
Although I am particularly interested in producing new pages for Chinese at whatever pace I can manage, the site also has or will have various other Language & Culture Link pages, multilingual/international news and information links, and some additional types of content.
Saturday, November 8, 2008
Politics and the US Election
Here is some vocabulary relating to the US election and some words about Politics in general. Some vocabulary for Chinese politics will have to be in another entry or perhaps several.
Obama 奥巴马 Ao4 ba1 ma3
Biden 拜登 Bai4deng1
McCain 麦凯恩 Mai4 kai3 en1
Bush 布什 Bu4shi2
Clinton 克林顿 Ke4 lin2 dun4
Hillary 希拉里 Xi1 la1 li3
Rice (Condoleeza) 赖斯 Lai4si1
Powell (Colin) 鲍威尔 Bao4 wei1 er3
Gore 戈尔 Ge1er3
Reagan 里根 Li3gen1
Johnson 约翰逊 Yue1 han4 xun4
Kennedy 肯尼迪 Ken3 ni2 di2
President 总统 zong3tong3
White House 白宫 Bai2gong1
Vice-President 副总统 fu4 zong3tong3
Senate 参议院 can1yi4 yuan4
Senator 参议员 can1yi4 yuan2
House of Representatives (USA) 众议院 zhong4 yi4 yuan4
Member of the House of Rep's 众议员 zhong4 yi4 yuan2
Cabinet (govt) 内阁 nei4ge2
Dept. of State 美国国务院 Mei3guo2 Guo2wu4 yuan4
Secretary of State 国务卿 guo2wu4 qing1
Government 政府 zheng4fu3
Democracy 民主主义 min2zhu3 zhu3yi4
Republic 共和国 gong4he2guo2
Policy 政策 zheng4ce4
Foreign Policy 对外政策 dui4wai4 zheng4ce4
Diplomacy, Foreign Affairs 外交 wai4jiao1
International relations 国际关系 guo2ji4 guan1xi4
Civil Rights 公民权利 gong1min2 quan2li4
Election 选举 xuan3ju3
Right to vote 投票权 tou2piao4 quan2
Vote 投票 tou2piao4
Voting machine 投票机器 tou2piao4 ji1qi4
Political party 政党 zheng4dang3
Democratic party 民主党 min2zhu3 dang3
Republican party 共和党 gong4he2 dang3
Economy 经济 jing1ji4
Financial Crisis 金融危機 jin1rong2 wei1ji1
Environment 环境 huan2jing4
Global Warming 全球变暖 quan2qiu2 bian4nuan3
Iraq War 伊拉克战争 Yi1la1ke4 zhan4zheng1
Soldiers 军人 jun1ren2
Withdraw troops 撤军 che4jun1
Withdraw troops 撤兵 che4bing1
War on Terrorism 反恐战争 fan3kong3 zhan4zheng1
Terrorism 恐怖主义 kong3bu4 zhu3yi4
Terrorist 恐怖主义者 kong3bu4 zhu3yi4 zhe3
Terrorist 恐怖分子 kong3bu4 fen4zi5
Terrorist organization 恐怖组织 kong3bu4 zu3zhi1
Terrorist organization 恐怖机构 kong3bu4 ji1gou4
Al Qaeda 基地组织 ji1di4 zu3zhi1
Ben Laden 本拉登 Ben3 La1deng1
Sadam Hussein 萨达姆侯赛因 sa4da2mu3 hou4sai4yin1
Weapons of Mass Destruction 大规模杀伤性武器 da4gui1mo2 sha1shang1xing4 wu3qi4
Disarmament 裁军 cai2jun1
Obama 奥巴马 Ao4 ba1 ma3
Biden 拜登 Bai4deng1
McCain 麦凯恩 Mai4 kai3 en1
Bush 布什 Bu4shi2
Clinton 克林顿 Ke4 lin2 dun4
Hillary 希拉里 Xi1 la1 li3
Rice (Condoleeza) 赖斯 Lai4si1
Powell (Colin) 鲍威尔 Bao4 wei1 er3
Gore 戈尔 Ge1er3
Reagan 里根 Li3gen1
Johnson 约翰逊 Yue1 han4 xun4
Kennedy 肯尼迪 Ken3 ni2 di2
President 总统 zong3tong3
White House 白宫 Bai2gong1
Vice-President 副总统 fu4 zong3tong3
Senate 参议院 can1yi4 yuan4
Senator 参议员 can1yi4 yuan2
House of Representatives (USA) 众议院 zhong4 yi4 yuan4
Member of the House of Rep's 众议员 zhong4 yi4 yuan2
Cabinet (govt) 内阁 nei4ge2
Dept. of State 美国国务院 Mei3guo2 Guo2wu4 yuan4
Secretary of State 国务卿 guo2wu4 qing1
Government 政府 zheng4fu3
Democracy 民主主义 min2zhu3 zhu3yi4
Republic 共和国 gong4he2guo2
Policy 政策 zheng4ce4
Foreign Policy 对外政策 dui4wai4 zheng4ce4
Diplomacy, Foreign Affairs 外交 wai4jiao1
International relations 国际关系 guo2ji4 guan1xi4
Civil Rights 公民权利 gong1min2 quan2li4
Election 选举 xuan3ju3
Right to vote 投票权 tou2piao4 quan2
Vote 投票 tou2piao4
Voting machine 投票机器 tou2piao4 ji1qi4
Political party 政党 zheng4dang3
Democratic party 民主党 min2zhu3 dang3
Republican party 共和党 gong4he2 dang3
Economy 经济 jing1ji4
Financial Crisis 金融危機 jin1rong2 wei1ji1
Environment 环境 huan2jing4
Global Warming 全球变暖 quan2qiu2 bian4nuan3
Iraq War 伊拉克战争 Yi1la1ke4 zhan4zheng1
Soldiers 军人 jun1ren2
Withdraw troops 撤军 che4jun1
Withdraw troops 撤兵 che4bing1
War on Terrorism 反恐战争 fan3kong3 zhan4zheng1
Terrorism 恐怖主义 kong3bu4 zhu3yi4
Terrorist 恐怖主义者 kong3bu4 zhu3yi4 zhe3
Terrorist 恐怖分子 kong3bu4 fen4zi5
Terrorist organization 恐怖组织 kong3bu4 zu3zhi1
Terrorist organization 恐怖机构 kong3bu4 ji1gou4
Al Qaeda 基地组织 ji1di4 zu3zhi1
Ben Laden 本拉登 Ben3 La1deng1
Sadam Hussein 萨达姆侯赛因 sa4da2mu3 hou4sai4yin1
Weapons of Mass Destruction 大规模杀伤性武器 da4gui1mo2 sha1shang1xing4 wu3qi4
Disarmament 裁军 cai2jun1
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
